DSpace/Dipòsit Manakin

Comparison of two different strategies of treatment with zoledronate in HIV-infected patients with low bone mineral density: single dose versus two doses in 2 years

Registre simple

dc.contributor Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya. Càtedra de la Sida i Malalties Relacionades
dc.contributor.author Negredo, Eugenia
dc.contributor.author Bonjoch, Anna
dc.contributor.author Pérez Alvarez, Núria
dc.contributor.author Ornelas, Arelly
dc.contributor.author Puig, Jordi
dc.contributor.author Herrero, C.
dc.contributor.author Estany, Carla
dc.contributor.author Río, L. del
dc.contributor.author Gregorio, S. di
dc.contributor.author Echeverria, Patricia
dc.contributor.author Clotet, Bonaventura
dc.date.accessioned 2015-11-03T09:45:59Z
dc.date.available 2015-11-03T09:45:59Z
dc.date.created 2015
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.citation Negredo, E., Bonjoch, A., Perez-Alvarez, N., Ornelas, A., Puig, J., Herrero, C., et al. (2015). Comparison of two different strategies of treatment with zoledronate in HIV-infected patients with low bone mineral density: Single dose versus two doses in 2 years. Hiv Medicine, 16(7), 441-448. ca_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1468-1293
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10854/4334
dc.description.abstract Objectives Given the need for easily managed treatment of osteoporosis in HIV-infected patients, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of zoledronate, by comparing three groups of patients: those with annual administration, those with biennial administration (one dose in 2 years) and a control group with no administration of zoledronate. Methods We randomized (2:1) 31 patients on antiretroviral therapy with low bone mineral density (BMD) to zoledronate (5 mg administered intravenously; 21 patients) plus diet counselling and to a control group (diet counselling; 10 patients). At week 48, patients treated with zoledronate were randomized again to receive a second dose (two-dose group; n = 12) or to continue with diet counselling only (single-dose group; n = 9). Changes in lumbar spine and hip BMD and bone turnover markers were compared. Results The median percentage change from baseline to week 96 in L1−L4 BMD was −1.74% [interquartile range (IQR) −2.56, 3.60%], 7.90% (IQR 4.20, 16.57%) and 5.22% (IQR 2.02, 7.28%) in the control, two-dose and single-dose groups, respectively (P < 0.01, control vs. two doses; P = 0.02, control vs. single dose; P = 0.18, two doses vs. single dose). Hip BMD changed by a median of 2.12% (IQR −0.12, 3.08%), 5.16% (IQR 3.06, 6.74%) and 4.47% (IQR 1, 5.58%), respectively (P = 0.04, control vs. two doses; P = 0.34, two doses vs. single dose). No differences between the two-dose and single-dose groups were detected in bone markers at week 96. Conclusions The benefits for BMD of a single dose of zoledronate in 2 years may be comparable to those obtained with two doses of the drug after 96 weeks, although this study is insufficiently powered to exclude a real difference. Future studies should explore whether biennial administration of zoledronate is a useful alternative in the treatment of osteoporosis in HIV-infected patients. ca_ES
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format.extent 8 p. ca_ES
dc.language.iso eng ca_ES
dc.publisher Blackwell Publishing ca_ES
dc.rights Tots els drets reservats ca_ES
dc.rights (c) Wiley
dc.subject.other Sida -- Tractament ca_ES
dc.subject.other VIH (Virus) ca_ES
dc.title Comparison of two different strategies of treatment with zoledronate in HIV-infected patients with low bone mineral density: single dose versus two doses in 2 years ca_ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article ca_ES
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12260
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess ca_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/publishedVersion ca_ES
dc.indexacio Indexat a WOS/JCR ca_ES
dc.indexacio Indexat a SCOPUS

Text complet d'aquest document

Registre simple

Buscar al RIUVic


Llistar per

Estadístiques