The main goal of this project is to validate and compare machine learning methods to perform GWAS analysis. This study worked with genomic data on Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The data obtained was imputed by the Michigan Imputation Server and pre-processed by a quality control at both SNPs and individual’s level. In order to reduce ...»»»»
The main goal of this project is to validate and compare machine learning methods to perform GWAS analysis. This study worked with genomic data on Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The data obtained was imputed by the Michigan Imputation Server and pre-processed by a quality control at both SNPs and individual’s level. In order to reduce the dimensionality, SNPs were filtered using different Linkage-Disequilibrium (LD) thresholds (0.2, 0.4 and 0.6). Filtered data was then analysed by five machine learning statistical methods: logistic regression, random forest, k-nearest neighbours, Gradient Boosting Machine and, deep neural networks. The model performance were compared using AUC, sensitivity, specificity and F-measure to evaluate the predictive capacity or reliability of the models. In addition, best models were validated using KEGG pathways. Our conclusion is that best results are obtained when applying a LD threshold of 0.2. From all the five algorithms performed, GBM with a LD threshold 0.2 was seen to be the best model to predict AD based on AUC, sensitivity, specificity, F-measure and validating the results with KEGG pathways.^^^^
